Opening Door When Unsafe

The case ofBC Courts Coat of Arms Yu v Dynamic Air Solutions involves a collision between a motorcycle and the open driver's door of a pickup truck on Southwest Marine Drive in Vancouver. The key liability issue is whether motorcyclists should be allowed to proceed down lanes with parked vehicles so long as there is sufficient room to pass.

image of open door at crash scene

The Door of the Parked Pickup

Chan Wai Chan parked the Ford pickup that he was driving at the curb of SW Marine Drive to complete notes of his last appointment. Once finished, he began to open the door of the pickup to exit. He claimed that he had checked his mirror and over his shoulder for other traffic before opening the door and had not seen any approaching traffic in the curb lane.

Motorcyclist Passing on the Right

Yi Hao Yu was riding a motorcycle in the middle lane of 3 lanes available for his direction of travel when the traffic light ahead turned red. He stopped and waited about 30 seconds before deciding to move into the gap between traffic in the second lane and vehicles that were parked in the curb lane.

The Collision

Mr. Yu struck the door as it opened and lost control of his motorcycle. He fell off the bike and skidded down the road, hitting two vehicles in the second lane. As his body finally came to a stop, he saw his bike skidding towards him, and he had to stop it with his legs.

Decision of Liability

Justice Branch examined the applicable laws for careless driving, passing on the right when opening a door is prohibited. As counsel raised the questions of bicycles operating in the same manner as Mr. Yu, he included this as well.

The justice decided the following:

[88] I conclude that each parties’ negligence contributed to the Accident:

a) If the plaintiff had been more patient and stayed in the second lane, the Accident would have been avoided.

b) If the plaintiff had been shaded more to the middle of the gap, it is more likely than not that the Accident could have been avoided.

c) If the defendant had properly checked his mirrors or paid more attention to any traffic coming up the curb lane, it is more likely than not that the Accident could have been avoided.

Share This Article

1) I was under impression that motorcyclists are supposed to follow the "car size". If there is a little space left where they can squeeze because of the size, it doesn't mean they should be able to do so. Like they are not supposed to ride in the middle of two lanes of traffic or on the shoulder in the traffic jam (even though technically they can without hitting anybody).

So how is it different here? The stopped car occupied the lane and the motorcyclist simply should not be there.

2) Once I was in the situation when I was driving in the leftmost lane on Kingsway (3 lanes one way). There was a motorcycle driving right behind me. I wanted to change the lane into the middle lane, turned the right turn signal and started changing the lane.

I changed it about 50% or so when I realized that another car from the rightmost lane was also changing the lane right into me.

I decided to return to the left lane, I did that very fast to avoid the collision with the car so I did not turn the left turn signal or didn't even look in the left mirror or shoulder check. At the same time when I was halfway in the middle lane, the motorcyclist decided to pass me. Half lane was enough for him because of the size.

Was it another car, they'd have to wait until I fully vacate the lane as they wouldn't have enough space to pass, but motorcycle is smaller.

When I returned back to the left lane, the motorcyclist had to cross the double yellow line into the upcoming traffic lanes to avoid the collision with me (luckily it was empty). Then there was a small episode of a road rage, he was mad at me and I was mad at him.

Now reading this story makes me think, who would be at fault if there was a collision between me and that motorcycle?

Both sections of the Motor Vehicle Act dealing with passing require that the pass be made in safety. Just because a space opens up does not mean that it is safe to occupy it.

ICBC calls it See, Think, Do: look around you and develop a picture of your current situation, think about what will happen if it changes in any way and finally do what you intend if it is safe.

Similarly, the sections regarding changing lanes include the same requirement for safety.

Finally, section 144 imposes an overall duty not to drive carelessly.

Too often road users assume an entitlement and run into trouble because of that assumption.

Liability is seldom 100% and you will see that as you read through the case law reported on this site.